Paige

Symbols

Comments

[this is good]
he seems like he is hyper, jittery, it is hard to focus when your eyes dart every direction like that. Very nice!
that's a very interesting concept! I must admit though, that I like the fact that "someone else interprets using their conglomerated understanding of those symbols"..
Somehow it makes me think that if things would not get lost in translation, we all would end up perceiving them the same way and therefore we'd be like robots, maybe? or not having a need to express ideas in different ways....wow these thoughts get wild if you let them go......"someone else interprets using their conglomerated understanding of those symbols"

[this is good]
Using your interpretation of Huxley's comments about the problem he had communicating on his "trip" you said, " Basically, you immediately experience the world but you can only communicate those experiences using symbols, which someone else interprets using their conglomerated understanding of those symbols."Isn't this what art is all about, our communicating symbols and ideas to the world while it tries to understand those symbols from their own experiences.

PS. Love the drawing.

His three-eyed eye is one of my favorite parts of this drawing. I didn't consider that it made him look skittish, but I agree (and like) that it does give that impression.

"if things would not get lost in translation, we all would end up perceiving them the same way and therefore we'd be like robots"

I think you said it much better than I did, but that's exactly what's been running through the back of my head. Here's my math nerd example. If, say, x were always always equal to 3 there'd be no reason for art or for most discussion, really. We would be like robots. Our lives would just be complex algebra problems.

I mean, it seems so obvious on the one hand, but at the same time it's sort of staggering and isolating to consider. I think it is, anyway.

"Isn't this what art is all about"

(smile) Yes! Absolutely! I think that's one of the reasons that the idea stuck with me. I just wasn't expecting it. I was in the middle of reading about this mescaline trip, enjoying his beautiful imagery, and all of the sudden I stumble across this idea about art and the challenges of communication. If I had been reading a book about art it would have been much less moving, I think.

I find symbols very fascinating. There is an idea that a society needs to share similar interpretations of symbols. If a person's interpretation differs too widely from the group's "understanding", that person is seen as crazy. So on the one hand, there is no one true meaning of a symbol, but everyone's individual and conglomerated understanding of it still needs to hover around some "median" interpretation.

That's part of the reason I love my scribbley art as much as I do. It's just stripped-down symbols.

P.S. Thank you!

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement